如下为2014年2月22日进行的雅思写作真题回忆。根据国内各地区的雅思考试学生回忆描述，经过笔者整理整合编辑而成，并给出小作文的注意点和大作文的写作论点，结合范文分析讲解。关于雅思写作的各项技巧，雅思全套课程的备考准备可咨询“南通环球教育”教学部专业教学团队。新浪微博 @ 南通环球教育直营校 @南通环球教育教研部

小作文

图表类型：表格题

比较马来西亚和澳大利亚1980年到2002年的人口数据。

参考范文：

因本场考试未能获得图表的具体数据，所以以下为大家提供剑七Test 1表格题的范文。

As is illustrated in the table, the proportions of consumer spending on various items in five countries differed from each other in 2002. It is evident that food/ drinks/ tobacco (F/D/T) had the largest proportion of consumer expenditure, whereas the smallest percentage was on leisure/ education. (L/E)

With regard to the consumption of (F/D/T), ranking top among five countries, Turkey accounted for 32.14%, followed by Ireland (28.91%). In comparison, consumers in other three countries expended around 16% of their money on this item.

As for C/F, Italy occupied the largest proportion, which was 9%, approximately twice that of Sweden (5.4%). The figures of Turkey, Spain, and Ireland were all around 6.5%.

In terms of L/E, although the percentages of expenditure in these countries were all under 5%, they differed slightly, ranging from 1.98% (Spain) to 4.35% (Turkey). Meanwhile, Swedes, Italian, and the Irish consumed 3.22%, 3.20%, and 2.21% respectively.

Overall, food, drinks and tobacco cost people in the five countries the largest amount of spending, displaying a stark contrast with leisure and education.

大作文

Children's education is expensive. In some countries, the government pays some of or all of the costs. Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages?

题型类别：议论类（利弊类）

题材类别：教育类

参考思路：

承认政府承担教育费用的可能风险：

1.政府的财政负担加剧；

2.道德水平较低的家长可能因此逃避责任。

肯定政府支持儿童教育的积极影响：

1.有效地促进儿童之间的教育公平；

2.从长远角度看，有利于社会发展和为人民谋福祉。

参考范文：

In an era of knowledge-based economy, education for all is a valued concept. The impacts of government funding on children's education have aroused widespread controversy. As far as I am concerned, potential benefits of this initiative overshadow its perceived drawbacks.

Admittedly, there may be challenges if government offer to pay for all children's educational expenses. For one thing, taking full responsibility for next generation's education is likely to incur an enormous financial burden for government. In other words, governments are accountable for not only education but other public services, such as public services, such as public transport, health care, and so forth. For another, it is also possible that some parents will take advantage of this policy. To be specific, people who are not morally aware may take it for granted and refuse to contribute to their sons' and daughters' future development, thus failing to play their roles in parenting.

Nevertheless, governments' engagement in children's education brings more profoundly positive impacts.

First and foremost, providing education for children regardless of their races and ethnicities can effectively foster educational equality. For instance, in many underdeveloped areas of the world, multitudes of parents have to work overtime in order to pay mounting bills. In this regard, if governments share some of children's tuition fees and accommodation fees, this will be a real blessing for families that are economically disadvantaged.

Moreover, under no circumstances should authorities downplay and neglect children's education. A convincing example is No Child Left Behind Act in the United States. By investing a considerable amount of money in supporting elementary and secondary education, American government will, in a long term, promote overall social development and well-being of its people.

In brief, children's education deserves financial support from government. Meanwhile, it should be borne in mind that educating the next generation is a shared obligation for a governments as well as individuals.